Summary: Direct broadcast satellite provider was not likely to succeed on a claim that an amendment to 47 U.S.C.S. 338 violated the First Amendment; the amendment, which accelerated the timetable for high-definition programming for noncommercial educational television stations, was content-neutral and likely to survive intermediate scrutiny. Basically Dish Network used high defintion programming for noncommercial educational television stations. That violated the First Ammendment.
What Type of Work: The type of work it was, was a film, and the film violated 1st amendment.
What were the results of the case- Dish Network won the Case, however they were warned not to do that again
